Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-04 15:00 EST ------- Not to step on Nigel's toes, but here are some comments: W: perl-Gnome2 devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl-versions.h W: perl-Gnome2 devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl.h W: perl-Gnome2 devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl-autogen.h These are expected rpmlint complaints for many arch-specific Perl modules. Something is wrong with the debuginfo package; it misses most of the source. There are many errors like: cpio: Gnome2-1.041/BonoboDock.c: No such file or directory cpio: Gnome2-1.041/BonoboDock.xs: No such file or directory cpio: Gnome2-1.041/BonoboDockItem.c: No such file or directory in the build log. This is more a bug in find-debuginfo.sh than it is in your package, but generally we try to fix such things when we find them. (This kind of thing happens often with Java packages for some reason.) The problem is that it's not looking in the xs directory. You can alleviate this by the incredibly nasty act of putting "cp xs/* ." at the end of your %build section. Otherwise, this package is clean and I would probably approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review