https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359473 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #3) > Thanks for taking a look! Updated source and spec, also some comments below: > > Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/dwarffortress/legendsbrowser.spec > SRPM URL: > https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/dwarffortress/legendsbrowser-1.0.12-2.fc24.src. > rpm > > > require are generate during the build > > My bad; for some reason, I assumed this was not the case. (This is my first > Java package). see spec file attached added Requires: mvn(commons-collections:commons-collections) Requires: mvn(commons-lang:commons-lang) because them are missing in classpath > > %dir %{_javadir}/%{name} > > prevent duplicate file > Is this no longer necessary? I was following this possibly obsolete document > on Java packaging > (https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#maven) and it had a > %dir file include of that form. Anyway, I commented it out in the updated > spec. yes is not necessary > > Add for each single JS library or fonts : Provides: bundled(foo) =fooversion > > Whoops. Added this information, and updated license accordingly ("and BSD > and CC-BY"). OFL: fontawesome-fonts-web (our spec file use this license) > > Seem also which most of the java/source code are without license headers. > > > Please, ask to upstream to confirm the licensing of code and/or content/s, > and add license headers > > I actually sort of have already have done so, although I did not ask for > licensing headers-- prior to me filing > https://github.com/robertjanetzko/LegendsBrowser/issues/9, upstream was not > even distributing a LICENSE file or making any other reference to the > license of the software that I could find (!). I can follow up though and > verify that *all* the code that isn't third-party JS/CSS/fonts is indeed MIT > if this is not sufficient. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx