[Bug 1350257] Review Request: petsc - Portable Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257

Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #3 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
I should probably take this, as I've packaged an earlier version.  However, I'm
about to go on holiday for 10 days, so I won't set the flag in case someone
else steps in.  (I'd been waiting ages to get hypre through as a dependency.)

I'd want it to support el6, though, which is probably still the predominant
distribution in HPC.  I'll attach a patch, but I could maintain for el6 if
necessary.

There are some components that could be added: at least scotch (I don't know
how it is in comparison with metis, but there's ptscotch already) and cgnslib,
with hypre in stable soon.  Any reason to avoid them?

I know Fedora linear algebra is a disaster area, but I wince whenever I see
reference BLAS used rather than openblas (or atlas where necessary).  Is there
any harm in linking against openblas?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]