[Bug 1354210] Review Request: xviewer - Fast and functional graphics viewer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210



--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> ---
Forgot, sorry:

Unknown or generated
--------------------
xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils/jpegint-8a.h
xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils/transupp-8a.h

These two files have IJG license, see README.8a file.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/IJG

Although:

GPL (v2 or later)
-----------------
xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils/jpegint.h
xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils/transupp-6b.c
xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils/transupp-6b.h
xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils/transupp-8a.c
xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils/transupp.h

make[2]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils'
  CC       transupp-6b.lo
  CCLD     libxviewer-jpegutils.la
make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils'

I don't understand. Do we see a (forbidden) try to relicense jpegutils files
from IJG to GPLv2+ and a case of bundling? How are those files relevant for the
project because 'BR: pkgconfig(libjpeg)'?

AND:
Did you report or ask about the unlicensed files as in comment #6 to upstream?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]