Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-03 01:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > That can be added, but needs to be added by upstream. I assume you're referring to the changelog. The problem is that the spec is part of Fedora, not the upstream source. It's maintained in Fedora CVS; someone else might come along and fix a bug or bump the release and rebuild the package, and at that point you'd end up with a change that's not upstream. > Yes, www.openfabrics.org is the right URL. OK, just checking. > As for the git snapshot, I created a make.dist script for the person that > maintains this repo, Well, as long as you're willing to deal with the pain of dealing with unversioned upstream source, there's no problem with it. > As for the static library, that's a common request of the people that make use > of this code. It just seems like a really poor idea for anyone to link statically against moving-target development code. Still, it's OK as long as nothing in Fedora actually links against those static libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review