[Bug 1341099] Review Request: taskotron-trigger - Triggering Taskotron jobs on fedmsgs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341099



--- Comment #4 from Martin Krizek <mkrizek@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jiri Kulda from comment #2)
> Package Review
> ==============
> 
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> [ ] = Manual review needed
> 
> 
> 
> ===== MUST items =====
> 
> Generic:
> [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
>      other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
>      Guidelines.
> [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>      Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
>      found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 20 files have
>      unknown license. 
> [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
>      Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/logrotate.d
> [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
> [x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
> [!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
>      beginning of %install.
>      Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
> [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
> [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
> [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
> [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
> [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
>      names).
> [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. 
> [x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
> [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
> [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
>      Provides are present.
> [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
> [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
> [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
> [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
> [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
>      (~1MB) or number of files.
>      Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
> [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
> [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
>      one supported primary architecture.
> [x]: Package installs properly.
> [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. 
>      Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). 
> [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
>      license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
>      license(s) for the package is included in %license.
> [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
> [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
> [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
>      that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
> [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
> [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
> [x]: Dist tag is present.
> [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
> [x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
> [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
>      work.
> [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
> [x]: No %config files under /usr.
> [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
> [x]: Package is not relocatable.
> [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
>      provided in the spec URL.
> [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
>      %{name}.spec.
> [x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
> [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
> 
> Python:
> [!]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
>      process.
> [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
>      provide egg info.
> [!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
> [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
> [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
> 
> ===== SHOULD items =====
> 
> Generic:
> [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
>      file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
> [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
> [x]: Package functions as described.
> [x]: Latest version is packaged.
> [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
> [?]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
>      translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
> [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
>      architectures.
> [x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
> [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
>      files.
> [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
> [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
> [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
> [x]: Buildroot is not present
> [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
>      $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
> [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
> [x]: SourceX is a working URL.
> [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
> 
> ===== EXTRA items =====
> 
> Generic:
> [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
>      Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
> 
> 
> Rpmlint
> -------
> Checking: taskotron-trigger-0.3.16-3.fc22.noarch.rpm
>           taskotron-trigger-0.3.16-3.fc22.src.rpm
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/taskotron-trigger
> fedmsg
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/taskotron-trigger
> fedmsg
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
> /etc/fedmsg.d/taskotron-trigger.py
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
> /etc/fedmsg.d/taskotron-trigger.pyc
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/taskotron-trigger
> fedmsg
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/taskotron-trigger
> fedmsg
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
> /etc/fedmsg.d/taskotron-trigger.pyo
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jobrunner
> 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Rpmlint (installed packages)
> ----------------------------
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/taskotron-trigger
> fedmsg
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/taskotron-trigger
> fedmsg
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
> /etc/fedmsg.d/taskotron-trigger.py
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
> /etc/fedmsg.d/taskotron-trigger.pyc
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/taskotron-trigger
> fedmsg
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/taskotron-trigger
> fedmsg
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
> /etc/fedmsg.d/taskotron-trigger.pyo
> taskotron-trigger.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jobrunner
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
> 
> 
> 
> Requires
> --------
> taskotron-trigger (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
>     /usr/bin/python
>     PyYAML
>     config(taskotron-trigger)
>     fedmsg
>     fedmsg-hub
>     git
>     koji
>     python(abi)
>     python-requests
>     python-twisted
> 
> 
> 
> Provides
> --------
> taskotron-trigger:
>     config(taskotron-trigger)
>     taskotron-trigger
> 
> 
> 
> Source checksums
> ----------------
> https://qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/releases/taskotron-trigger/taskotron-
> trigger-0.3.16.tar.gz :
>   CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
> daa15bea166449ae286b34dce7b253b21d8a79ebc1193dff1fe6f4b07c60a25c
>   CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
> daa15bea166449ae286b34dce7b253b21d8a79ebc1193dff1fe6f4b07c60a25c
> 
> 
> Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20
> Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --rpm-spec -n
> Downloads/taskotron-trigger-0.3.16-3.fc23.src.rpm
> Buildroot used: fedora-22-x86_64
> Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
> Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell,
> R, PHP, Ruby
> Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
> 
> 
> Comments 
> --------
> - rm -rf %{buildroot} in the beginning of %install section should be removed.
> 
> - I think python will download extra dependencies listed in setup.py:
> 	moksha.hub - probably
>         fedmsg     - probably not because it is in Requires
>         requests   - Same case as fedmsg
>   If not they need to be added into requires...
> 
I will remove moksha.hub from setup.py upstream since it's dep of fedmsg.

> 
> - In readme should be "In /etc/fedmsg.d/logging.py, add the following
> handler::" instead of "In /etc/fedmsg.d/logging, add the following
> handler::" but it's minority.
> 

Good catch, will fix that upstream.

> - In installing there should be added options for preserving timestamp

Thanks for the review!

Updated version:
Spec URL: https://mkrizek.fedorapeople.org/specs/taskotron-trigger.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mkrizek.fedorapeople.org/srpms/taskotron-trigger-0.3.16-4.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]