Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-02 18:50 EST ------- This builds fine for me; rpmlint complains about the lack of a changelog entry, which you need. The upstream URL seems to make no mention of this package. Is it really the correct URL? Given that this is a git snapshot, is it really a good idea to ship static libraries? I'd imagine that it would be a bad idea to link statically against in-development code. (And if you really need the static library, please include a comment in your spec as to why it's required.) To be kind to the potential reviewers of your packages, please include the text from the spec's Summary: in the Summary field of the ticket and include actual links to the spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review