[Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libibcommon


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387





------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-07-02 18:50 EST -------
This builds fine for me; rpmlint complains about the lack of a changelog entry,
which you need.

The upstream URL seems to make no mention of this package.  Is it really the
correct URL?

Given that this is a git snapshot, is it really a good idea to ship static
libraries?  I'd imagine that it would be a bad idea to link statically against
in-development code.  (And if you really need the static library, please include
a comment in your spec as to why it's required.)

To be kind to the potential reviewers of your packages, please include the text
from the spec's Summary: in the Summary field of the ticket and include actual
links to the spec and srpm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]