https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349604 Ondřej Lysoněk <olysonek@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(olysonek@redhat.c |needinfo?(ignatenko@redhat. |om) |com) --- Comment #4 from Ondřej Lysoněk <olysonek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #2) > > - 'If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown > > must be documented in the spec.' > upstream writes what is licensed under what, so don't see problem here Well, I'm just (blindly) following the guidelines here and it says that there should be some note about this in the spec. For example, they suggest: [quote] Including a file as %license which contains the licensing breakdown for the packaged files, then using: # For a breakdown of the licensing, see PACKAGE-LICENSING [end quote] So just add a reference to the LICENSE file to the spec above the License: field and we're good here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx