https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #1 from Ben Rosser <rosser.bjr@xxxxxxxxx> --- Having thought about the include file situation further... I believe they probably should be removed from the package: Their authorship and copyright is difficult to assert (most of the community written files are not licensed, and ti83plus.inc was originally written by TI and then heavily modified), most authors of TI calculator assembly projects bundle them with their code anyway, and spasm does not expect include files to be available system-wide to begin with. The AUR package for Arch makes a similar decision and does not include them. I have also realized the package was not being built with system-wide ldflags, so I fixed that and reuploaded the package. Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/spasm/spasm-ng.spec SRPM URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/spasm/spasm-ng-0.5-0.3.beta.2.fc23.src.rpm I believe it is now ready for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx