https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #4) > (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1) > > Can you use the name pseudoroot for package and binary? I think pseudo is a > > too generic name and pseudoroot would be in conjunction with fakeroot what > > does similiar things. > > Makes sense. I'll ask upstream. On second thought, I don't think it's an issue. Besides, Ubuntu is already packaging it as "pseudo"[1] and upstream's rationale for the name is that it's pronounced similar to "sudo". [1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/pseudo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx