[Bug 1357283] Review Request: obconf-qt - A configuration editor for the OpenBox window manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357283



--- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *
obconf-qt.armv7hl: I: checking
obconf-qt.armv7hl: I: checking-url https://github.com/lxde/obconf-qt (timeout
10 seconds)
obconf-qt.armv7hl: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/obconf-qt/COPYING
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

obconf-qt.armv7hl: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obconf-qt
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

obconf-qt.i686: I: checking
obconf-qt.i686: I: checking-url https://github.com/lxde/obconf-qt (timeout 10
seconds)
obconf-qt.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/obconf-qt/COPYING
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

obconf-qt.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obconf-qt
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

obconf-qt.src: I: checking
obconf-qt.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/lxde/obconf-qt (timeout 10
seconds)
obconf-qt.src: I: checking-url
https://github.com/lxde/obconf-qt/archive/0.9.0.tar.gz#/obconf-qt-0.9.0.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
obconf-qt.x86_64: I: checking
obconf-qt.x86_64: I: checking-url https://github.com/lxde/obconf-qt (timeout 10
seconds)
obconf-qt.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/obconf-qt/COPYING
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

obconf-qt.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obconf-qt
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

obconf-qt-debuginfo.armv7hl: I: checking
obconf-qt-debuginfo.armv7hl: I: checking-url https://github.com/lxde/obconf-qt
(timeout 10 seconds)
obconf-qt-debuginfo.armv7hl: E: debuginfo-without-sources
This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files.
This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during
the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often
is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security
consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo
extraction not working as expected.  Verify that the binaries are not
unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used.

obconf-qt-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
obconf-qt-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url https://github.com/lxde/obconf-qt
(timeout 10 seconds)
obconf-qt-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources
This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files.
This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during
the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often
is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security
consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo
extraction not working as expected.  Verify that the binaries are not
unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used.

obconf-qt-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
obconf-qt-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url https://github.com/lxde/obconf-qt
(timeout 10 seconds)
obconf-qt-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files.
This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during
the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often
is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security
consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo
extraction not working as expected.  Verify that the binaries are not
unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used.

7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings.


There are some warnings about incorrect FSF addresses, those needs to be filed
a s an upstream bug. But no blockers for now. Same for the missing man page.

But an empty debuginfo package needs to be taken seriously. I don't know that
much about the special behavior of cmake in this case, but mostly adding
CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" to the "make" call helps.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]