https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186 Rick Tierney <rick.tierney@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |needinfo?(nhorman@xxxxxxxxx |l.com) |m) --- Comment #76 from Rick Tierney <rick.tierney@xxxxxxxxx> --- Great! But as mentioned in Comment 69 above: I have 2 changes I need to make: 1. I Updated the Version and Release numbers in the spec file to match our source version/release numbers. My predecessors were using a strange number I never understood but I continued to use it during my development. Now that we're ready to deploy this I need to use the correct version/release number. 2. The Intel legal team wants our license files to be readily available in the application folder. While I have left the license files where they were (i.e. /usr/share/licenses/opa-fmgui, I have updated a %post script (buildlinks) to create symbolic links to the license files in the application folder. This way I meet the RPM standards of marking the license files as %license and I can keep our legal team satisfied that the licenses are readily accessible by the user. These changes are pretty minor, but they do need to get put in there before we push to Fedora. Should we do a new review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx