[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186

Rick Tierney <rick.tierney@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |
                   |l.com)                      |



--- Comment #69 from Rick Tierney <rick.tierney@xxxxxxxxx> ---


(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #67)
> Shoot, I meant to sponsor you, I'll take care of that Now.
> 
> as for the package review,  You shouldn't need any more changes.  What is it
> you feel needs changing?

Neil:

I had been trying to figure out sponsorship and one of my guys here at Intel
contacted Michael Schmidt to get the ball rolling. That was yesterday, but I
haven't heard back yet.

I have 2 changes I need to make:

1. Update the Version number to match our source version number. My
predecessors were using a strange number I never understood but I continued to
use it during my development. Now that we're ready to deploy this I need to use
the correct number.

2. The Intel legal team wants our license files readily available in the
application folder.  I updated a %postun script to create symbolic links to the
license files in /usr/licenses/opa-fmgui

These changes are pretty minor, but they do need to get put in there before we
push to Fedora.

Rick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]