https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048 --- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #9) > (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #8) > > > > > > > > Yes, it's for Fedora; it is a modest work but useful. > > > > > > Nothing against, I was just lazy/busy :) Maybe I will try to create > > > something. > > > > Sorry, I am unable to provide it because: > > - the appdata contains update contact. I am not upstream and I don't want to > > be the update contact. > > Your are not upstream, you are responsible of the package and so of the > appdata file on Fedora. > Regarding appdata I am afraid it's not written anywhere. Please see the upstream specification: https://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/ i.e.: > ...we have defined a new data file, which the upstream project can optionally translate using the same technique as GSetting schemas or Desktop files. So this should be addressed upstream the same way as .desktop files are. And upstream knows the best how to create cool screenshots of their project. > > - I can't host the screenshots and I think it should be hosted upstream > > Your space on fedorapeople.org ? > Well, this is really strange idea. In case it should be managed by package maintainers there should be some official infrastructure for it in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx