Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding@xxxxxxxxx 2007-07-01 10:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > Well, for 0.9.0-2: > > > > > > * Comments > > > - Are the comments above Summary entry needed? > > > I suggest to remove them > > > > I'm confused here. Which comments do you mean? > > There are a few empty lines above > > "Summary" in the spec file, but those are mandated by my support of other RPM > > based distributions (SUSE 10.2 and 10.3). > - What I meant here is the parts of > ------------------------------------------------ > # RPM spec file for the Brutus Keyring. > # Copyright (C) 2007 OMC Denmark ApS > <snip> > # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, > # MA 02111-1307 USA > # > ------------------------------------------------ So I should remove the more or less standard GPL license notice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review