[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hylafax


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542


fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-06-30 22:12 EST -------
(In reply to comment #45)
>  
> Christoph: Are you still interested in reviewing this?

Yes, but this really is a hard one, especially as there is confusion (about the
name) and regressions. As I said before, the 2 latest packages don't work at all
because of the not executable files. 

(In reply to comment #46)
> Getting packages into Fedora Extras seems quite impossible :-)

Lee,
I'm very sorry about that, of course this is partly my fault. On the other hand:
The binary package you gave me in comment #40 simply doesn't work and I don't
think this is because of machine but of the package itself.

I promise (once again) to look at this more deeply tomorrow.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]