Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-30 22:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > > Christoph: Are you still interested in reviewing this? Yes, but this really is a hard one, especially as there is confusion (about the name) and regressions. As I said before, the 2 latest packages don't work at all because of the not executable files. (In reply to comment #46) > Getting packages into Fedora Extras seems quite impossible :-) Lee, I'm very sorry about that, of course this is partly my fault. On the other hand: The binary package you gave me in comment #40 simply doesn't work and I don't think this is because of machine but of the package itself. I promise (once again) to look at this more deeply tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review