https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352667 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- Issues (non blocking): [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL (unversioned/unknown version)", "Artistic (v2.0)", "GPL (v2) (with incorrect FSF address)", "LLGPL", "LGPL (v2.1)", "ISC", "GPL (v1 or later)", "Public domain", "CDDL", "GPL (v3 or later)", "AFL-3.0", "BSL", "LGPL (v3 or later)", "Beerware", "BSD", "BSD (2 clause)", "EPL-1.0", "GPL (v3)", "Artistic (v1.0)", "Apache (v2.0)", "FreeType", "GPL (v2 or later)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "MPL (v1.1)", "BSD (3 clause)", "Public domain GPL (v3)", "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2)", "LGPL (v2 or v3)", "GPL (unversioned/unknown version)", "MPL (v2.0)", "LGPL (v2.1 or v3)". 13 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1352667-licensecheck/licensecheck.txt These source files are without license headers: App-Licensecheck-v3.0.1/bin/licensecheck App-Licensecheck-v3.0.1/lib/App/Licensecheck.pm Please, ask to upstream to confirm the licensing of code and/or content/s, and ask to add license headers https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification - Permissions on files are set properly. Note: See rpmlint output See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions licensecheck.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/licensecheck 555 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx