https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352091 gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i | |t) | --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ding-Yi Chen from comment #4) > Thanks gil, > > Come to think of it, since I also need enunciate-core and > enunciate-jersey-rt, should I make the enunciate as main package instead, > and provide enunciate-core-rt, enunciate-core, enunciate-jeresy-rt as > sub-packages? yes, is ok for me. but is available a new version: https://github.com/stoicflame/enunciate/releases/tag/v2.5.0 you should add a comment, in the spec file, as to why you want to import this old version maybe you could remove: %mvn_package ":enunciate-parent" enunciate and change or remove the main package in %files -f .mfiles-%{name}-parent %license license.txt notice.txt .... %files core-rt -f .mfiles-%{name}-core-rt %doc README.md %license license.txt notice.txt or %files parent -f .mfiles-%{name}-parent %license license.txt notice.txt ... i dont understand this: # remove enunciate-core-annotations, because it is in other package rm -f %{buildroot}/%{_javadir}/enunciate/enunciate-core-annotations.jar rm -f %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/maven-metadata/enunciate-enunciate-core-annotations.xml rm -f %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/maven-poms/enunciate/enunciate-core-annotations.pom you should disable this module, and use the other package and for last you should add missing build-requires: mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server:1) mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-servlet:1) mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-spring:1) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx