Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-30 18:09 EST ------- Sorry for the delay in replying, I was in a short vacation. With respect to comment #24 and #25: I think that all packages which require smtpdaemon, MTA and usr/sbin/sendmail should be hunt down, tested, the real resource that they need should be identified and the package fixed according to the proposal in comment #25. However I think that the provides which are supported by the application (such as mailq for ssmtp - despite the fact that it does nothing) should be kept. For what is worth: - syslog (and syslog-ng) and mdadm work very happy directly with the /usr/sbin/sendmail file. I use them for almost an year on lots of live servers with ssmtp relaying the messages to the core logging server. So I bet that if msmtp would install a correctly configured alternative for /usr/sbin/sendmail these packages would not break. - squirrelmail can be configured to use either the sendmail binary directly or a SMTP server running on port 25. OTOH I am almost sure that no one installing a webmail server would want to use esmtp/msmtp/ssmtp as backend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review