https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335988 --- Comment #20 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #19) > (In reply to Jerry James from comment #17) > > Provides: bundled(tinymt32) > > Where is in Fedora ? It isn't in Fedora. I'm just thinking the fact that it is bundled should be noted so that, should it ever be introduced into Fedora, its presence in this package can be determined. > > - The documentation bundles some javascript code: > > o doc/codemirror.{css,js} (MIT) > > o doc/FileSaver.js (MIT) > > o doc/matchbrackets.js (MIT) > > Should be packaged in %_jsdir ? No, I don't think so. I think they are fine where they are; again, I'm just wondering if the spec file shouldn't note the fact that these are bundled in the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx