Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222478 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-30 15:39 EST ------- sofia-sip is essentially done; I've placed it in a local repo so that I can build this. Hmm, a new version just came out within the last month. I went ahead and bumped the version and rebuilt just to make sure there were no major changes; everything seems fine to me so I'll just approve this package and you can update it when you check in. For a CLI application, this sure has an amazing dependency list, including all of X. I guess that all comes along with the gstreamer-plugins requirements. * source files match upstream: 7aa8a02bee0aeb42be934aefeba058aff70b3a409e5b4113e9030a738b9c0800 sofsip-cli-0.12.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. X latest version is 0.13 * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: sofsip-cli = 0.12-1.fc8 = gstreamer-plugins-base gstreamer-plugins-farsight gstreamer-plugins-good libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libreadline.so.5()(64bit) libsofia-sip-ua-glib.so.3()(64bit) libsofia-sip-ua.so.0()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Frankly I have no idea how to test this. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review