https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335278 --- Comment #29 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Julian Sikorski from comment #28) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #27) > > (In reply to Julian Sikorski from comment #26) > > > I am not sure what do you mean about LICENSE files not being packaged - the > > > 10 LICENSE files are actually part of mame-data and > > > mame-data-software-lists. Please may you elaborate? > > > > Are part of mame-data but not tagged with %license (this macro pushes > > license files in /usr/share/licenses/package_name). > > > > I think you should rename them by indicating the type of license and tag > > them with %license. > > I am not completely convinced... As things stand now, it is clear which > LICENSE file applies to which folder. If everything goes to %licensedir, > this information will be lost. > > > Those directories are matched with README files, if it remember fine, which indicate the license. All licenses go in /usr/share/licenses/mame-data like happens with other packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx