https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265265 Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> --- - rpmlint checks return: mlt.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoders -> trans coders, trans-coders, transponders The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. mlt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoders -> trans coders, trans-coders, transponders The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. mlt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, ml, x ml The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. mlt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US extendible -> extensible, extendable, vendible The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. . . .and several incorrect FSF addresses. Ignorable. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( GPLv3 and LGPLv2+ ) OK, but there are some BSD-licensed bits in win32., text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r So it looks great. You might want to address the BSD bits in the Windows portion in some way. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx