https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876 --- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #8) > Also, why are you packaging a snapshot instead of a released version? > > > %if 0%{?fedora} > 23 > > BuildRequires: perl-podlators > > %endif > > You can get rid of the conditional if you do a BuildRequires: > /usr/bin/pod2man > Better "%{_bindir}/pod2man". If Fedora decides to move the prefix again or if somebody wants to port the spec file to SCL. But the condition is wrong. E.g. F23 has the program in perl-podlators package. Actually, the first Fedora with perl-podlators is F19. Also RHEL-7 has the package. > > Requires: perl(Net::IP) > > Requires: perl(Net::DNS) > > Requires: perl(IO::Socket::INET6) > > Requires: perl(File::Temp) > > Hmm, these should be autogenerated; but only Net::IP is. Seems like the > dependency generator ignores requires if they don't start in column zero... > Collective wisdom says indented "require" statements generates too many false positives. Therefore generators omit them. But I'm not fully convinced about helpfulness of the omission. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx