[Bug 246302] Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246302


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-06-29 18:41 EST -------
There's no reason for the explicit dependency on perl; rpm finds that on its
own.  I don't think it's a blocker, though, merely redundant.

Review:
* source files match upstream:
   777fbd9d78cc8a47b926ad03a9b05bf3b1ec09055b9694edeac8b5b4475dc63e
   sub2srt-0.5.3.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (none)
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   sub2srt = 0.5.3-1.fc8
  =
   /usr/bin/perl
?  perl (unnecessary)
   perl(Getopt::Long)
   perl(strict)

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.  It does run OK, though I have 
   no files to test it with.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]