https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297854 --- Comment #4 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "Unknown or generated". 10 files have unknown license. Detailed > output of licensecheck in /home/slaanesh/Downloads/1297854-purple- > libsteam/licensecheck.txt That's ok, but please ask upstream to include the appropriate headers in the files. > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in pidgin- > libsteam , purple-libsteam-debuginfo Dependencies specified like this means the "pidgin-libsteam.i686" can consider its dependencies satisfied by a "purple-libsteam.x86_64" package. Will then it work? If it does, it's correct, if not then you should use this as a dependency: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} This also applies to purple-skypeweb as well, but it came to my mind now. If the i686/x86_64 package mix does not work, please update this spec file and re-build also the purple-skypeweb package with that. Apart from this, package looks good! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx