Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbm2l2030 - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 2030 printer language Alias: pbm2l2030-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243980 mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs- |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-29 16:40 EST ------- + source files match upstream: 2a1e36314c2028c29352f66b4bda046e /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/pbm2l2030-1.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. + latest version is being packaged. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: [root@storm pbm]# rpm -qp --provides /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pbm2l2030-1.4-1.fc8.i386.rpm pbm2l2030 = 1.4-1.fc8 [root@storm pbm]# rpm -qp --requires /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pbm2l2030-1.4-1.fc8.i386.rpm libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) [root@storm pbm]# + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review