https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335278 --- Comment #25 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Andrea Musuruane from comment #24) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #23) > > - Some source files (involved in the building) are released > > > > under LGPLv2+ license > > src/mame/audio/snes_snd.cpp: LGPL (v2 or later) > > src/devices/sound/tiasound.cpp: LGPL (v2) (with incorrect FSF address) > > src/devices/sound/tiasound.h: LGPL (v2) (with incorrect FSF address) > > > > source code 3rdparty/bgfx under ASL 2.0 > > > > artwork under CC0 license > > > > definitions for BGFX under BSD > > > > plugins/json under MIT license > > > > keymaps under CC0 license > > > > hash under CC0 > > > > docs/* under CC0 > > > > All these licenses can be condensed as > > > > ** License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and ASL 2.0 ** > > Fedora guidelines require to specify the License tag and that is the license > of the contents of the *binary* RPM (and therefore it is not a list of > licenses found in source files): > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines > > Therefore the license is GPLv2+. It's a Mixed Source Licensing Scenario: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario These ones > > artwork under CC0 license > > > > definitions for BGFX under BSD > > > > plugins/json under MIT license > > > > keymaps under CC0 license > > > > hash under CC0 > > > > docs/* under CC0 are licenses of data files, not listed with License tag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx