[Bug 1334894] Review Request: python-sync2jira - Sync pagure and github issues to jira, via fedmsg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334894

Julien Enselme <jujens@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #3 from Julien Enselme <jujens@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines (python2-jira.noarch
doesn't exit, but python-jira.noarch does).
- Buildarch -> BuildArch
- Please escape %{py2} macro in comments (%{py2} -> %%{py2}) to avoid two
rpmlint warnings
- Please remove upstream's egg-infos
- Correct non-executable-script error


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/1334894
     -python-sync2jira/licensecheck.txt
[X]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/systemd/system,
     /usr/lib/systemd
[X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[X]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[X]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[X]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[X]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
jira package is python-jira.noarch not python-jira2.noarch that's why
installation failed in mock.

[X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[X]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[X]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[X]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[X]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[X]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[X]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[X]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[X]: Latest version is packaged.
[X]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[X]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[X]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[X]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
     Note: %define requiring justification: %define py2 %{nil}
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.2.17 starting (python version = 3.5.1)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux disabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled dnf cache
Start: cleaning dnf metadata
Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
Mock Version: 1.2.17
INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.17
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s):
/tmp/1334894-python-sync2jira/results/python2-sync2jira-0.2-1.fc25.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
--releasever 25 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=false install
/tmp/1334894-python-sync2jira/results/python2-sync2jira-0.2-1.fc25.noarch.rpm


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-sync2jira-0.2-1.fc25.noarch.rpm
          python-sync2jira-0.2-1.fc25.src.rpm
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pagure -> pasture
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) github -> git hub,
git-hub, GitHub
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) jira -> lira, Mira,
IRA
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fedmsg -> Feds
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repos ->
ropes, reps, repose
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pagure ->
pasture
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git
hub, git-hub, GitHub
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fedmsg ->
Feds
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope,
rep, reps
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pungi ->
fungi, punning
python2-sync2jira.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sync2jira/main.py 644 /usr/bin/env
python2-sync2jira.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sync2jira
python-sync2jira.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pagure -> pasture
python-sync2jira.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) github -> git hub,
git-hub, GitHub
python-sync2jira.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) jira -> lira, Mira, IRA
python-sync2jira.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fedmsg -> Feds
python-sync2jira.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repos -> ropes,
reps, repose
python-sync2jira.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pagure -> pasture
python-sync2jira.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git
hub, git-hub, GitHub
python-sync2jira.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fedmsg -> Feds
python-sync2jira.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope,
rep, reps
python-sync2jira.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pungi -> fungi,
punning
python-sync2jira.src:6: W: macro-in-comment %{py2}
python-sync2jira.src:34: W: macro-in-comment %{py2}
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 23 warnings.




Requires
--------
python2-sync2jira (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python2
    python(abi)
    python2-fedmsg-core
    python2-jira
    python2-requests



Provides
--------
python2-sync2jira:
    python-sync2jira
    python2-sync2jira



Source checksums
----------------
https://pypi.io/packages/source/s/sync2jira/sync2jira-0.2.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
60d649da41d523a6a65f8c0da0d420232e0f6d4fa5018cc3bc8560938986d56a
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
60d649da41d523a6a65f8c0da0d420232e0f6d4fa5018cc3bc8560938986d56a


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1334894
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R,
PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]