[Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491


peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-06-28 23:12 EST -------
Here we go.... a formal review of ndesk-dbus 0.5.2-3:

OK: Source matches that of upstream:
     $ md5sum dbus-sharp-0.5.2*.tar.gz
86312f99721a97dc8028343d477fd4be  dbus-sharp-0.5.2-srpm.tar.gz
86312f99721a97dc8028343d477fd4be  dbus-sharp-0.5.2-upstream.tar.gz.
OK: Package naming is good; and the BuildRoot is sane.
OK: Package license (MIT) is acceptable for Fedora and matches that of upstream;
and a copy of this is included in the package as %doc (COPYING).
OK: -devel subpackage properly requires pkgconfig since it installs a .pc file.
OK: Package builds fine in mock (F-7, x86_64); though it fails in Devel (see below).
OK: Spec file is legible and in American English.
OK: Final file and directory ownership looks good; and the %files listing
contains no duplicates. 
OK: The buildroot is cleaned before anything else is done in %install; and a
proper %clean section is used.
OK: Macros are consistent; though the choice was made to use $RPM_foo variables
instead of their respective %foo definitions (entirely aesthetic).
OK: Package contains permissible code.
OK: Files marked as documentation (%doc) do not affect runtime capabilites.
OK: Package contains no libtool files (*.la).	
OK: All files and their names are proper UTF-8.



N/A: This package does not install locale data; so %find_lang handling is not
needed.
N/A: This package does not install shared libraries; so ldconfig invocations in
%post/%postun are not necessary.
N/A: A separate -doc subpackage is not required since this installs very little
documentation.
N/A: Package is not a GUI application; so no .desktop magic is needed.
N/A: Scriptlets are not used.

 
-- BAD ---

  (1) rpmlint output:
> W: ndesk-dbus summary-not-capitalized ndesk-dbus is a C# implementation of D-Bus.
> W: ndesk-dbus summary-ended-with-dot ndesk-dbus is a C# implementation of D-Bus.
> W: ndesk-dbus-devel summary-not-capitalized ndesk-dbus is a C# implementation
of D-Bus.
> W: ndesk-dbus-devel summary-ended-with-dot ndesk-dbus is a C# implementation
of D-Bus.
These are aesthetic; but your Summary should not end in a period ("."); and it
also should not need the "ndesk-dbus is..." prefixing phrase. 


> W: ndesk-dbus obsolete-not-provided dbus-sharp

If it is a true replacement for the old libdbus wrapper, please add a "Provides:
dbus-sharp" along with the Obsoletes tag.

> E: ndesk-dbus only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
Since it installs files to %_libdir, it should not be a noarch package. (Then
again, I'm not too familiar with how Mono handles this. Input from someone who
is would be greatly appreciated. ^_^)

> W: ndesk-dbus-devel no-documentation
It might be wise to add COPYING as the sole %doc file in this subpackage; but
this is otherwise harmless.
 

(2) Development subpackages (*-devel) should have a full EVR for the base
dependency; E.g., change the dependency to Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}. 

(3) This fails to build in Mock in Development. Adding mono-core to the
BuildRequires appears to fix it.

	make -C src
	make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/dbus-sharp-0.5.2/src'
	gmcs -debug -unsafe -d:STRONG_NAME -out:NDesk.DBus.dll -t:library 
-r:Mono.Posix   -keyfile:../ndesk.snk Address.cs AssemblyInfo.cs Bus.cs
BusObject.cs Connection.cs ExportObject.cs Authentication.cs Protocol.cs
Mapper.cs MatchRule.cs Message.cs MessageFilter.cs MessageReader.cs
MessageWriter.cs PendingCall.cs SocketTransport.cs Transport.cs
TypeImplementer.cs Wrapper.cs UnixTransport.cs UnixNativeTransport.cs DBus.cs
Introspection.cs DProxy.cs Signature.cs
	make[1]: gmcs: Command not found
	make[1]: *** [NDesk.DBus.dll] Error 127
	make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/dbus-sharp-0.5.2/src'
	make: *** [all] Error 2

	$ rpm -qf `which gmcs`
	mono-core-1.2.4-1.fc8


(4) Your %setup invocation should be quieter: Use the "-q" option.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]