https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331914 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #2) > Package Review > ============== > > Legend: > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > > ===== Issues ===== > > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > One file has unknown license, or a license header is missing: > src/test/java/org/relique/jdbc/csv/TestFileSetInputStream.java > Ask upstream to include the missing license headers. Done https://sourceforge.net/p/csvjdbc/code/ci/64040bc1ae27255799b4e75858859278a7be231c/ > [!]: Summary line is a bit messy I would write either "Java driver for ..." > or > "JDBC for ..." Done > ===== Non-blockers ===== > > [!]: SourceX is a working URL. > I know there's no upstream tarball, just adding this for a reference. Done > ===== MUST items ===== > > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have > unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in > /home/makerpm/rev/csvjdbc/licensecheck.txt ?? Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/csvjdbc.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/csvjdbc-1.0.29-1.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx