https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336726 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(lemenkov@xxxxxxxx | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hello, Randy! Thanks for reviewing this, and here is a story behind this package. About 6 years ago lucene_parser was bundled with riak_search application and now is shipped with riak_search. This is very unusual - typically Erlang application consists of a bunch of libraries, which in turn depends on other libraries. Typically this all is being fetched by rebar - one package by another accordingly to a rebar.config contents. Shipping two libraries with different versions in the same tarball causes issues while installing and building dependency graph, and I really don't think we should add a special exception just for this case. I've asked upstream if it's possible to split this library off: https://github.com/basho/riak_search/issues/180 Regarding version - lucene_parser does has it's own version number. It's "1" (not "1.0", or "1.0.0", or anything else). See this file: * https://github.com/basho/riak_search/blob/7818ac9/apps/lucene_parser/src/lucene_parser.app.src#L4 Regarding source tarball. I agree with you - it's better to ship not the latest tarball of riak_search as a source, but rather a corresponding snapshot of this commit: * https://github.com/basho/riak_search/tree/7818ac9 If you have any questions or I did made anything even more unclear then don't hesitate to ask :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx