[Bug 1160671] Review Request: seafile - Cloud storage system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671



--- Comment #14 from Julien Enselme <jujens@xxxxxxxxx> ---
> and this weird error:
> seafile-devel.x86_64: E: non-devel-file-in-devel-package /usr/lib64/libseafile.so.0.0.0

This comes from the fact that
/usr/lib64/libseafile.so.0
/usr/lib64/libseafile.so.0.0.0

are in seafile-devel but they should be in seafile. Only the unversioned so
files go into the devel package.

> seafile.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

I think this comes from /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libseafile.pc but it is in the
devel package. I see no other file that may be causing this. Unless it comes
from the python files that are not binary.

> I'm also getting two warnings from fedora-review, that I'm not getting when building the package on my own
> seafile-devel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libseafile.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0
> seafile-devel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libseafile.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libjansson.so.4

I have the same with fedora-review but I cannot reproduce if I launch rpmlint
manually. Maybe ask the devel list about this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]