https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338999 Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-MooseX-Role-Strict-0.05-1.fc25.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.0) 1 perl(Moose) 1 perl(Moose::Exporter) 1 perl(Moose::Meta::Role) 1 perl(Moose::Meta::Role::Application::ToClass) 1 perl(Moose::Role) 1 perl(MooseX::Meta::Role::Strict) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-MooseX-Role-Strict-0.05-1.fc25.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(MooseX::Meta::Role::Strict) = 0.05 1 perl(MooseX::Role::Strict) = 0.05 1 perl-MooseX-Role-Strict = 0.05-1.fc25 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-MooseX-Role-Strict* perl-MooseX-Role-Strict.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/perl-MooseX-Role-Strict/xt/pod.t perl 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. TODO: Please remove 'xt' from %doc. Please consider fixing 'TODO' items. Otherwise package looks good. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx