https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318988 --- Comment #31 from Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #21) > I hope i fixed most of the issues you mentioned: > - source is now based on upstream tag > - zero is no longer build > - specfile renamed > - summary shortened. Sorry to say it, but i insists on shared prefix with > main jdk. > > Fixed and need to go to main jdks: > - license macro used properly now. > - invalid license fixed Great, thanks! > Kept > - upstream url - it is valid url. It i sparent of all projects on > openjdk.java.net. I consider it as better source of information then direct > project. Also it would be lost during first sync > - patches commented out reduced by updating to latest upstream tag. I have > no intentions to remove commented patches, as my intention is to keep > pathces aligned with regular rpms. Any removing wil just increase > maintenance cost. > - same with provides > - systemtap have no real upstream (imho) and the tutorial how to built it is > in generate_tarballs.sh which is in repo > - pkg is now based on u77, so the priority will jump for you again. But once > the CPU update is done next week, mainjdk will be main again. And tbh:) I > would liek to prefer this jdk when both are installed :) > - yes, bundled lcms is workaround OK. This seems justified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx