[Bug 225746] Merge Review: fedora-release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: fedora-release


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225746





------- Additional Comments From dev@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-06-28 09:31 EST -------
Package name:             OK (fedora-release)
License:                  FAIL (GFDL vs. GPL)
Spec Legible:             OK (en_US) (see note)
md5sum matches:           NA (fedora = upstream)
rpmlint clean:            WARN
Builds correctly:         OK (noarch)
Spec has %clean:          OK
Macro use consistant:     OK
Contains code/content:    OK
-doc subpackage:          NA
-devel subpackage:        NA
-static subpackage:       NA
pkgconfig depend:         NA
Contains %doc:            OK (GPL)
Library suffix:           NA
No .la files:             NA
Use desktop-file-install: NA
No duplicate ownerships:  OK
rm -rf %{buildroot}:      OK
RPM uses valid UTF-8:     OK
%defattr is set:          OK (see note)
No duplicate %files:      OK
Not relocatable:          OK
Calls ldconfig:           NA
Supports Locales:         NA
BR's are correct:         OK

%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%attr(0644,root,root) /etc/fedora-release
/etc/redhat-release
%dir /etc/yum.repos.d
%config(noreplace) /etc/yum.repos.d/*
%doc GPL
%config(noreplace) %attr(0644,root,root) /etc/issue
%config(noreplace) %attr(0644,root,root) /etc/issue.net
%config(noreplace) %attr(0644,root,root) /etc/rpm/macros.dist
%dir /etc/pki/rpm-gpg
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/*

Makes me want to scream!
1. Please oh please don't put a %doc in the middle of a list of /etc files
2. %attr's seem redundant, 0644 can be implyed with install or even cp
3. I *think* %dir /etc/pki/rpm-gpg is redundant
4. I believe %{_sysconfdir} is perfered over /etc/file

Spec file claims GFDL where the tarball provides GPL

rpmlint:
W: fedora-release non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY
W: fedora-release non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-beta
W: fedora-release non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-test
W: fedora-release non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide
W: fedora-release non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora
W: fedora-release non-conffile-in-etc /etc/fedora-release
W: fedora-release non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rawhide
W: fedora-release unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-release
W: fedora-release unversioned-explicit-provides redhat-release

(last two are okay)

I'll set to reviewed when changes hit cvs

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]