https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335988 --- Comment #10 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #8) > > # LGPLv3+: src/Fl_GDI_Printer.cxx, src/Flv_List.cc, src/Flv_Table.cc > > # BSD: src/tinymt32* > > License: GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and BSD > > Are files under BSD and LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+ combined into a single compiled > binary? Then the license is just GPLv3+. The "License" tag is about the > binary rpm, not the sources. # LGPLv3+: src/Fl_GDI_Printer.cxx, src/Flv_List.cc, src/Flv_Table.cc # BSD: src/tinymt32* are involved during build. Is it not a Mixed Source Licensing Scenario ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario > > s/french/French/ > > I'm afraid you'll have to repack the tarball to remove the non-free doc > part, because the SRPM must be distributable. Removing it during package > build is too late. We need to contact upstream. I'm waiting for confirmation of XCAS's forum registration. (In reply to Han Frederic from comment #9) > Up to now I was not able to reproduce Jerry's crash. Is it easy for you to > reproduce it? > if it is related to pari_init_opts the only thing I see is that giac try to > guess if another library (ex sage) has already done a pari_init with the: > if(!avma) test. But many libs (ex eclib) does the same because it is a > problem for sage to remove it. This failed test comes out if I try to compile giac http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/debian/dists/stable/main/source/giac_1.2.2-45.tar.gz always on Fedora > 22. Do you know why the packages from http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/debian/dists/stable/main/source are biggest than those from http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/giac/ ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx