Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx,notting@xxxxxxxxxx The situation here is slightly messed up, since I already updated the gtksourceview package in rawhide to 1.90 (ie v2) before realizing that there is a reasonable number of packages still depending on v1, and that upstream is actually planning to maintain the versions parallel-installable. To rectify this, I propose revert the gtksourceview package to the v1 version of the library (which requires an epoch), and moving v2 to a new gtksourceview2 package. Here are the specs and packages (I only include the v1 package for completeness, the review request is about gtksourceview2). http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gtksourceview/gtksourceview.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gtksourceview/gtksourceview-1.8.5-2.fc8.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gtksourceview/gtksourceview2.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gtksourceview/gtksourceview2-1.90.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review