[Bug 1335988] Review Request: giac - Computer Algebra System, Symbolic calculus, Geometry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335988



--- Comment #7 from Han Frederic <han@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6)
> (In reply to Han Frederic from comment #5)
> > (This remark is not related to the pb in comment2)
> >  
> > I think for a package (and checksums) you should really use the  source from:
> > http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/debian/dists/stable/main/source/
> > numbered in 1.2.2-x
> > see
> > http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/debian/dists/stable/main/source/
> > README
> 
> Are they post-releases which include bug-fixes ?
yes, but my experience is that the file 1.2.2 you have used is either a link or
a copy of the latest 1.2.2.x in
http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/debian/dists/stable/main/source/
so it may changen that is why I use only the files named 1.2.2-x for the sage
packages.
> Effectively with giac_1.2.2-45.tar.gz there are failures like Jerry said in
> comment#2.
> 
I have given this link to Bernard Parisse, so he saw this but may need more
info.

> > and not this one
> > Source0:      
> > http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/giac/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
> > because it is always the latest 1.2.2-x so it could change.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]