https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335988 --- Comment #7 from Han Frederic <han@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6) > (In reply to Han Frederic from comment #5) > > (This remark is not related to the pb in comment2) > > > > I think for a package (and checksums) you should really use the source from: > > http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/debian/dists/stable/main/source/ > > numbered in 1.2.2-x > > see > > http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/debian/dists/stable/main/source/ > > README > > Are they post-releases which include bug-fixes ? yes, but my experience is that the file 1.2.2 you have used is either a link or a copy of the latest 1.2.2.x in http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/debian/dists/stable/main/source/ so it may changen that is why I use only the files named 1.2.2-x for the sage packages. > Effectively with giac_1.2.2-45.tar.gz there are failures like Jerry said in > comment#2. > I have given this link to Bernard Parisse, so he saw this but may need more info. > > and not this one > > Source0: > > http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/giac/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 > > because it is always the latest 1.2.2-x so it could change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx