Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 ------- Additional Comments From nikolay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-27 19:36 EST ------- Yes, leaving the provides for sendmail was wrong. I'm still concerned with the use of alternatives. 20 is low enough not to be auto chosen by alternatives. repoquery --whatrequires /usr/sbin/sendmail mutt-5:1.5.14-4.fc7.x86_64 arpwatch-14:2.1a15-3.fc7.x86_64 pgp-tools-0:0.4.9-1.fc7.noarch redhat-lsb-0:3.1-14.fc7.x86_64 mdadm-0:2.6.1-4.fc7.x86_64 bcfg2-server-0:0.9.3-2.fc7.noarch quilt-0:0.46-1.fc6.x86_64 otrs-0:2.1.5-2.fc7.noarch squirrelmail-0:1.4.10a-1.fc7.noarch dbmail-0:2.2.5-2.fc7.x86_64 websec-0:1.9.0-4.noarch fvwm-0:2.5.21-4.fc7.x86_64 uudeview-0:0.5.20-12.x86_64 fcron-0:3.0.2-2.fc7.x86_64 So it's not just mutt. And there is a chance that one of these doesn't work with msmtp. Maybe because of the lack of local delivery or the account(or user) oriented configuration or something else. And mutt requires sendmail interface so it must require sendmail binary. So it seems it's better just not to tell mutt that it can use msmtp. The packages for libntlm and libgsasl were successfully built in koji. So I can add BuildRequires for libgsasl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review