https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334059 Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx | |m --- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- In reply to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503#c14: > > and Clonk Game Content License > > http://www.clonk.de/developer.php?lng=en > > Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ > > > > which License tag should i use now ? > > As far as I can evaluate, the license tag has to be "ISC and CC-BY-NC". but > have a look at the tables in the licensing guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Bad_Licenses_3 > The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License is mentioned there as > a "bad license" (maybe due to inacceptable restrictions). So I'm afraid this > package is only releasable in RPMfusion. http://wiki.openclonk.org/w/FAQ#What_is_the_license_for_OpenClonk.3F CC-BY-SA is a good license for Fedora. > $ licensecheck -r * | grep BSD > thirdparty/getopt/getopt_long.c: BSD (3 clause) > thirdparty/getopt/getopt.c: BSD (3 clause) > > This refers to bundled stuff. We don't use this, we need to pull the getopt > development files from the build system. This also means you still have to > remove thirdparty/getopt, better the whole thirdparty directory to be on > safer side. Maybe a patch is needed to use the local getopt instead of the > bundled one. Where are getopt files on Fedora? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx