https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405 --- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- Not a showstopper, dash would be just more in line with current practice. I would really help if you extended the %description to give a two-three sentence high-level overview of what this package is. It is rather unusual package so this is particularly important in this case. I will check the licensing later. Apart from that it's hard to do a meaningful review: basically none of the fedora guidelines are applicable. It'd be nice to have the BR on separate lines, for the sake of sake of diffability. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx