https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744416 --- Comment #16 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #14) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License:_field > says: "The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the > binary > rpm." - as the "install-sh" file is not part of the binary RPM, I would not > add MIT to the spec file (at least that's my understanding). Yes indeed. I had written the same thing .. :) So, -doc subpackage is the only "issue" remaining. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx