[Bug 1279104] Review Request: python-pbkdf2 - password-based key derivation in pure Python

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104

William Moreno <williamjmorenor@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |williamjmorenor@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #6 from William Moreno <williamjmorenor@xxxxxxxxx> ---
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. 
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
OK: The License field in the package spec match the actual license.
OK: The text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %license.
OK: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
OK: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
OK: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [17]
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.

Your package looks good, I will take your review request and become your
sponsor but I want so see some informal reviews before aprobe the package and
sponsor you as package maintainer.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]