https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #3) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2) > > What do you mean? > I meant that the timestamps issue is also mentioned in guidelines so > therefore I considered that the guidelines are not met. > > Solved > By soliving timestamps you also solved guidelines issue. As simple as that. Maybe could i remove, the code do not contains resources ... > > The original source code is available @ https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/ which include LICENSES files. But i don't want use because i don't want download also 3 GB of useless crap for only 113 KB of source code > I agree, sounds reasonable. > > documentation as above > All right I don't pursue including the whole documentation. I also think > creating a simple readme at least explaining where to find information in > case of need would be nice. Also for tracking reasons. It's not mandatory > though. > > Just a quick yes or no answer on the documentation and I'll approve this > package. Sorry i do not understand that kind of documentation is needed. If it is for the source code just take a look at the POM file (maven-antrun-plugin). Instead, for the functionality of these apis just the generated java documentation. Finally I do not think I will add nothing else. Thanks for your patience -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx