Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245878 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-27 04:15 EST ------- <In reply to comment #2) > How about add another dict next time? Add another -a <N> > So I think it is better to use the same > scheme as other dic spec files. OK, more bluntly: Your construct is a broken hack. If you prefer one line per packages, then at least do it the rpm way: %setup -c -T -n %{name}-%{version} %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} -D -T -a 0 %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} -D -T -a 1 Compare what happens using this construct: + rm -rf stardict-dic-ja-2.4.2 + /bin/mkdir -p stardict-dic-ja-2.4.2 + cd stardict-dic-ja-2.4.2 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 1005 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 1005 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + cd /home/user/src/rpms/BUILD + cd stardict-dic-ja-2.4.2 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /home/user/src/rpms/SOURCES/stardict-edict-2.4.2.tar.bz2 Against what happens with your contruct: + '[' '!' -d stardict-dic-ja-2.4.2 ']' + cd /home/user/src/rpms/BUILD + cd stardict-dic-ja-2.4.2 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /home/user/src/rpms/SOURCES/stardict-edict-2.4.2.tar.bz2 + tar -xf - => MUSTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review