https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590 --- Comment #29 from paul.j.reger@xxxxxxxxx --- (In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #28) > (In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #27) > > To be clear, 10.1, is actually, currently in a pre-release state. > > I see. In that case Release value should be something like: > 0.1.20160420git.%{?dist} > as in the guidelines for pre-release packages: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre- > Release_packages > To further clarify, the PSM package has already been fielded in two other versions: 10.0.0 and 10.0.1 of RHEL and SLES. 10.1 is the next incremental release and it will include Fedora too. I am noticing that if I add %{?dist} to the Release: tag, that it propagates throughout the entire naming conventions requiring major changes in our packaging code in our Makefile. For example, the Source0: tag has %{release} in it and so that causes the .tar.gz file to include the short distro name. Are you sure the %{?dist} is needed in the Release: tag? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx