https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590 --- Comment #17 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #13) > > Could you please use a full URL in the Source tag? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL > > I need to know if this _needs_ to be changed? It's preferred to use a full URL to the source archive. If for some reason no such URL exists, at least there must be a comment in the spec file explaining how to obtain that exact source archive. Did you read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL ? It even has examples for github hosted projects. I don't understand why this is controversial. What disadvantages do you see? (In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #14) > Do you know if SUSE will automatically get the dependency on libuuid? I'm pretty sure it will. At least on a current openSUSE Tumbleweed it works as expected. This is what happens if I try to remove libuuid1: # rpm -e libuuid1 error: Failed dependencies: libuuid.so.1()(64bit) is needed by (installed) libSM6-1.2.2-5.4.x86_64 ... and many more errors like this, while there are none about "libuuid1". This demonstrates that openSUSE too uses dependencies on library sonames and not on library package names. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx