Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-26 12:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3, Xavier) > Also, i see no license text or file in this package. Are you under the impression that this is mandatory? If there's a license file in the upstream tarball then it has to be included in the package. If upstream includes no license file then the package maintainer certainly doesn't have to manufacture one. (In reply to comment #4, Spot) > It is possible to put noarch R packages into %{_datadir}/R/library, instead of > in %{_libdir}/R/library (where arch-specific R packages should go). That's great; do you just do the usual R CMD INSTALL and give the other directory? Does this work for FC6 and F7? > I'd argue that the DESCRIPTION is a useful %doc item. I certainly agree; rpm -q --info certainly does not give the same information as is present in the DESCRIPTION file. I really don't understand why Xavier would make such a comment unless he didn't actually look at what's in the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review