https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #23 from David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxx> --- Adam, The issue I was trying to fix was when rpmlint errors about the following... slurm.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libpmi.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] slurm-pam_slurm.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /lib64/security/pam_slurm_adopt.so ['/usr/lib64'] slurm-pam_slurm.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /lib64/security/pam_slurm.so ['/usr/lib64'] slurm-perlapi.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Slurm/Slurm.so ['../../../../src/api/.libs', '/usr/lib'] slurm-perlapi.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Slurmdb/Slurmdb.so ['../../../../src/db_api/.libs', '/usr/lib'] Now some of the rpaths in the libraries are redundant and some are plain dangerous... Not sure if you've ever looked at this but the perl bits give me the creeps with the relative rpath bits... I've included the upstream systemd files with the new build as well. Thanks, - David Brown -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx